Search for: "People of the State of Ill. v. U. S" Results 121 - 140 of 282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in  United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
” But Justice Sotomayor objected to the court’s decision that limits “specific jurisdiction by holding that a corporation that engages in a nationwide course of conduct cannot be held accountable in a state court by a group of injured people unless all of those people were injured in the forum state. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 (b) This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, and Section 381.986, Florida Statutes, and under the home rule powers of Hillsborough County and is in the best interest of the health, peace, safety and general welfare of the people of Hillsborough County. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 (b) This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, and Section 381.986, Florida Statutes, and under the home rule powers of Hillsborough County and is in the best interest of the health, peace, safety and general welfare of the people of Hillsborough County. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Hypocrisy makes people uneasy because it suggests unfairness:  someone gets credit for holding a professed view without “doing the work” of acting on, or receiving the consequences of that view.[1] This form of human perception is not necessarily wrong:  in some cases the public position is indeed a dishonest front for the speaker’s real agenda. [read post]