Search for: "People v Ackerman" Results 121 - 140 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
It sounds harsh, but maybe people in the middle class need to decide to take a pay cut. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
It sounds harsh, but maybe people in the middle class need to decide to take a pay cut. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
  Questions of constitutional fidelity and constitutional restraints on policy making have figured prominently in each of the nation’s several epochs of heightened constitutional awareness, as Bruce Ackerman and many others have reflected. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 As Bruce Ackerman explained in volume I of We the People: After the New Deal revolution, “[a] commitment to federalism . . . was no longer thought to require a constitutional strategy that restrained the national government to a limited number of enumerated powers over economic and social life. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Gerard Magliocca
Rev. 504, 516-18 (1983). [11] 294 U.S. 240 (1935). [12] 295 U.S. 495 (1935). [13] See, e.g., 2 Bruce Ackerman, We The People:  Transformations 302 (1998) (“I have been focusing on the supreme importance of the Schechter decision in refining the emerging New Deal vision of activist government. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]