Search for: "People v Amazon.com" Results 121 - 140 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 5:04 am by SHG
People change too, but not so much as tech. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘IP on the net’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Change.gov content now under creative commons license (EFF) (Creative Commons) (Lessig) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) (Creative Commons) DMCA exemption petitions (ContentAgenda) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (EFF)… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
And the new paperback is just $12.91 on Amazon.com! [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
Amazon.com Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Patent case transferred to California, citing location of defendants and witnesses: Software Archives v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The TechnoLlama was first to let the IPKat know what the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did last week in Perfect 10 v Amazon.com and Google Inc (full text of the judgment here).Left: not the TechnoLlama but the DeliLlamaThis decision is a must-read decision for anyone who is concerned with the development of copyright doctrine in the field of cached thumbnails. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:08 pm by Lara
Facebook TMs lots of LIKE marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Hells Angels pick fight with Amazon.com (over trademark infringement) Frustrated Trademark Attorney Examines Frustrated Marks Geekview IP Week in Review [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
Renner: Domain names are personal property (IP Osgoode) Influenced by Amazon.com decision, CIPO issues new guidelines for patent examiners (IP Osgoode)   China Nokia claims RMB10 million in damages against Huaqin for patent infringement: Nokia v. [read post]