Search for: "People v Davies (Mark)" Results 121 - 140 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
’” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “the cases of two Arkansas inmates, Don William Davis and Bruce Earl Ward, sentenced to death by courts in that state” have raised the stakes in McWilliams v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
”  Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The list included former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and former People editor Neil Wallis. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nathan Davis, Sara Liss, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]