Search for: "People v Grates"
Results 121 - 140
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
If you know people who work at the different institutions listed above, feel free to contact them to thank them for their contribution to our site or to learn how you can support them. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:57 pm
We'll be grateful. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:46 am
The renewed Ericsson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Rev. 731, 751-62, 773-93 (2013); People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
EDIT: this piece brought in a lot of reaction, for which I am grateful. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:50 pm
I would be very grateful for your comments. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:16 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
The case, Lebovits v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
The case, Lebovits v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:03 pm
But that's hardly a world in which I'd prefer to live.So let's show the relevant people here -- law professor and appellate advocate alike -- some love.You can simultaneously reject an argument yet appreciate the sentiment. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:20 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:56 pm
” This is an important ruling for the common-sense rights of all people. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 6:47 am
But as the Grateful Dead once said, "If you got a warrant, I guess your gonna come in. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:15 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:53 pm
Unfortunately, in 2013, the Supreme Court crippled one of the most effective protections of that act in its Shelby County v. [read post]
