Search for: "People v Griffith"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:17 pm
In Harper v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:38 am
In R. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
But in constitutional or personal injury law, a disputant is likely to occupy only side of the "v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
Supreme Court’s hottest cases next term is Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
Supreme Court’s hottest cases next term is Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:43 am
Carnail v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Circuit last year in Ali v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Munaf v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
Edison thought films were like lightbulbs; DW Griffith understood that storytelling was the key. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Circuit, in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
In this context, we owe much deference to the considered judgment of the People’s elected representatives. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Hegwood v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Cat Griffiths, Editor of The Lawyer, will be shedding some light on this. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Although he's described as a speaker, along with Lorna Woods, Dan Wilsher and Jonathan Griffiths, he's just going to be giving a few thoughts on the commercial impact of next week's ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Joined Cases C-403/08 FA Premier League and others v QC Leisure and C-329/08 Murphy v Media Protection Services. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
