Search for: "People v High"
Results 121 - 140
of 13,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:49 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm
Doe I and Cargill v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
(People v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:36 am
Apparently it's not just organized crime that effectively encourages crime.Scott, unfortunately, was captured by the police during a high-speed chase after the robbery. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:34 am
Knapton v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
In Hesseltine v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
On June 26, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
Dissatisfied, both parties appealed to the Supreme People’s Court which reached its decision in December 2023 (then published in January 2024). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Katz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
The result was a high-speed chase into Canada that ended abruptly with a roadblock and a shootout with the pursuing Canadian officers. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:44 pm
Seems like a good deal for the bond company; they'll get their $5,000 fee (ten percent) and the odds are super high that Al-Zetawi will show up for trial. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:24 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington approved a settlement agreement today in Favela Avendaño v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 3:00 am
The differences led to the historic decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
Christie v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:46 am
Supreme Court made this finding for the first time in a 1986 decision, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
At least when demand for the underlying product is, shall we say, high:"Pycher, Radnia, and Adam Larson founded Nestdrop in 2013. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
But Justice Liu's opinion, "the 20-year arc of the high court’s Sixth Amendment jurisprudence raises serious questions about the constitutionality of California’s death penalty scheme. [read post]
