Search for: "People v Mitch" Results 121 - 140 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am by Alexander Vindman
Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has recognized that “[t]he mob was fed lies” and “[t]hey were provoked by the [former] president and other powerful people. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:14 pm by Jason Kelley
Cindy first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Mandatory retirement provisions within partnership agreements do not violate labour laws or human rights, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today in McCormick v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:35 pm by Cody M. Poplin
” The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court heard arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by SHG
  Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm by Nora Ellingsen
” The Post also pointed out that Mitch McConnell has yet to chime in. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am by Josh Blackman
In an alternate reality, Justice Garland would be on the Supreme Court, Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by SO Issues
Anthony Nicholas OrbanOriginal Article There appears to be more to this story than what is being reported, see the video below. 04/27/2012 West Hollywood (PRWEB) - Jury selection began today in People of the State of California v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
 In a speech on the Senate floor, for example, Senator Mitch McConnell  argued that documents from Kagan’s past “reveal a woman whose approach to the law was as a political advocate — the very opposite of what the American people expect in a judge. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]