Search for: "People v Powell"
Results 121 - 140
of 637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
” People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:16 pm
This includes: U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:33 am
Case v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Rothera, The Tenacious "Twin Relic": Republicans, Polygamy, and The Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:00 am
In my latest FindLaw column I discuss the case of Bowen v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
To be sure, Nixon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Powell pointed to a line of Supreme Court cases, beginning with the 2004 case Crawford v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The breakthrough last year came with Witt v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
Terry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am
CJLF has filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Maples v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:10 am
Since Justice Lewis Powell’s pathmarking 1978 opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
" The People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am
” Toward the opinion’s end, she noted that 25 years had elapsed since Justice Lewis Powell provided the decisive fifth vote to uphold affirmative action in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Ceballos, Kansas v. [read post]
