Search for: "People v Singh"
Results 121 - 140
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
The trouble was that such people do smoke in the house. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
On 13 July 2012 there is an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
On 15 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) heard the claimant’s appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
BT and Dramatico v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
In Varkey Joseph v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
Conservation, 18 NY3d 652, 657 [2012]; Matter of Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
Prime Minister Singh recently announced he is for duty-free imports from all of Africa. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) dismissed the application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
Reiterating its stance, the Solicitor General on Monday submitted that the 2018 decision in Navtej Singh Johar v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court had an opportunity to examine this issue in Narayan Singh v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:30 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Singh v Clark Builders, 2025 ABKB 3 [22] The primary issue is whether the termination provision in the Employment Contract is binding. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Writing in the Guardian Simon Singh welcomes the decision. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
From an FBI Affidavit in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944 it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Dhirendra Singh Rajpurohit v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
Secondly, there is the libel claim brought by His Holiness Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj against journalist Hardeep Singh, stayed by Mr Justice Eady in May 2010 ([2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)) and then the subject of an appeal. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Thankfully, while Tom Watson blocks libel reform on the grounds that Parliament needs more time (Infra), the Court of Appeal has stepped in to bring a degree of sanity into libel proceedings in BCA v Dr Singh. [read post]
