Search for: "People v Tomlinson" Results 121 - 140 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The new FCC chairman has announced plans to stop a privacy rule that would limit what internet service providers can do with people’s private data. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am by Graeme Hall
(An example could include increasing protections for older people; a topic which the Human Rights in Ireland blog considers here). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The article, which appeared in The People, had wrongly alleged she was to be investigated over allegations of slavery. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian considers how, and if, the proposed changes will help ordinary people pursue a defamation claim. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Ireland The Garda Commissioner has secured a “unique” order for a hearing behind closed doors of civil actions by two people alleging defamation in Sunday World articles related to the State’s Witness Protection Programme. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation Last week on Inforrm, Hugh Tomlinson QC considered whether compulsory regulation of the print media could be compatible with Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  There was a report of the decision in the Press Gazette focussing on the case of the actor Ricky Tomlinson. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:16 am by Rachit Buch
Flood v Times: how does this affect calls for libel reform? [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court‘s recent decision in Pritchard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
  I certainly believe that our judiciary should reflect better the changing mores of our times and the constituent peoples of our nation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
 This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by INFORRM
But should comment be as legally free on people’s private lives? [read post]