Search for: "People v Vias" Results 121 - 140 of 6,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
I, No. 7 — via Four Peaks Advisors Manager Maude Why It’s So Important that Employees Share Your Values — via Workology Yes, I Have a F***ing Problem With People Who Swear at Work — via Fistful of Talent A Winning Parental Leave Policy Can Be Surprisingly Simple — via Harvard Business Review Trump v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 8:49 pm by Injury at Sea
The master reported that seven people were abandoning ship into a life raft. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
  So Long, Secretary Perez: DOL Head’s Goodbye Message — via Wage & Hour Insights Ochoa v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
And I got curious—just how do people feel about the l’il ol’ Oxford comma. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
  (Put to one side whether the lawyer can put you on the stand to testify, since that's neither the issue here nor do we need to get into the thorny issue of how one "knows" that testimony is perjured or a defendant's right to testify via a narrative. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
Via this thoughtful essay by Pejman Yousefzadeh, I learned about this recent CNN interview by Candy Crowley of former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Bennett, via New York Criminal Defense.In that case, the prosecution charged that a second-grade victim was twice raped within a 7 month window, close to the 9 month window that was previously held to be a per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
Apparently Wandsworth are very very unhappy with the Court of Appeal judgment in Wandsworth v Randall on underoccupation possessions via ground 16 HA 1985. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
An Employer's Misstep Discussed… — via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Employer Need Not Pay for Worker Security Screenings: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am by Michael C. Dorf
Rahimi, rejecting a Second Amendment challenge to a federal statute forbidding firearms possession by people subject to domestic violence protective orders; and Dep't of State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:59 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In any event, the limitation upon the President’s appointment power is there not for the benefit of the Senate, but for the protection of the people; it should not be dependent on Senate action for its existence. [read post]