Search for: "People v Word"
Results 121 - 140
of 17,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm
In its 1995 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm
In its 1995 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:55 pm
" Corban v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
As I note in that same column, corpus linguistics has also been used in other appellate opinions and was formally endorsed by the Michigan Supreme Court in the 2016 case People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
But we're talking about the words of the statute here. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:23 am
In other words, if people discuss what their lawyer says in a business context, does this waive the attorney-client privilege in the lawsuit. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
In other words, they were adult-like consequences for teenage mistakes. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
Using the immortal words of Paul McCartney John Lennon (oops!) [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
And since it doesn't get you much these days to have a scrip, we shouldn't expect people to have it in any event. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
Just a couple of extra words we usually don't see. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:32 am
"Asked Justice Alito in yesterday's oral argument in Iancu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:53 pm
If you tell me that someone has a "good" character for truthfulness, that word -- "good" -- tells me that they have an above-average character for truthfulness. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
This synecdochian dual-functionality of a mark is wholly valid; however, should the perception of the public change drastically as to the meaning of the word, i.e. if most people would believe and/or use the term "to google" to mean using any search engine online to seek information, then the mark can be determined to be compromised, even with this accepted dual-functionality. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 1:14 pm
Until the 1977 Supreme Court decision in the case of Bates v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
History Through the Eyes of Everyday People. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
They were murdered.The distinction, the words, the language matters. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
Therefore, he gives out the big words without hesitation to people who lack English proficiency. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 1:49 pm
But I nonetheless thought that every single word of Justice Chin's opinion was spot on.Every. [read post]
