Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 121 - 140
of 838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
" Kanter (Barrett, J., dissenting). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
In King v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
Brackeen, much discussed by others on this blog, I discuss a potential pattern in Justice Barrett's treatment of precedent, something I had noticed earlier in her concurrence in Fulton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:05 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
Barrett and Thomas dissented. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
In 2015, people anticipated that the Court would consider the question in Elonis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am
’” In a solo dissent, Thomas criticized what he characterized as the majority’s “surprising and misplaced reliance on New York Times v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
In 2019, in Rucho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
Gonzalez and Twitter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Ditto Justices Barrett, Jackson and Thomas, who have each authored six. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
[United States v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules that law criminalizing encouragement of illegal immigration is constitutional
24 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” The policy at the center of the case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Barrett quoted an earlier decision that described Heller’s declaration as a “passing reference. [read post]