Search for: "People v. Booker"
Results 121 - 140
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:13 pm
Georgia, Coker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
In a landmark decision, Communication 296/05, Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) v The Sudan, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruled on a communication centring on allegations of a wide range of human rights violations committed by the Sudanese government and non-state actors against the people of Darfur. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Just identifying all those relists on the court’s docket, and then figuring out the legal issues involved, was a big job for people who really do have other responsibilities. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:42 pm
The justices will likely hear the case, Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm
Sanders, “holding the Constitution’s command that the House of Representatives be elected ‘by the People’ requires that congressional districts be equal in population” New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:27 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am
On Monday the Court accepted certiorari in Connick v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am
Booker holding that the federal Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional unless treated as advisory. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Rowland: The court held that under the facts of this case, Blakely v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
But in James v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:57 pm
Booker and Gall v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
As far as the anonymity of social workers is concerned well, that ship sailed with the Bristol City Council v C & Ors [2012] EWHC 3748 (Fam) case. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
In Renico v. [read post]
