Search for: "People v. Brents"
Results 121 - 140
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Shell case, Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This contrasted with a more applicant-oriented description of the scheme given by Sedley LJ in R (Saadat) v Rent Service [2002] HLR 32: The fundamental purpose of the housing benefit scheme … is to ensure that people who are not under-occupying property and not over-paying rent are not made homeless through genuine inability to pay. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:10 am
Now, yesterday, Anthony V. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
In his opinion today in FCC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:37 am
$1.83 $3.104 69.6% Crude oil, European Brent (barrel) $43.48 $99.02 127.7% Crude oil, West TX Inter. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
Hussain v London Borough of Hounslow [2010] EW Misc 15 (CC) (01 December 2010) Not sure why this one wasn’t written up in November. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:25 pm
It is an expensive government program with the power to kill people. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
” People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:47 am
See BP America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]