Search for: "People v. Conte" Results 121 - 140 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
Although the defendant apparently urges that SORA classification procedures violate procedural due process, the New York Court of Appeals recently analyzed a claim with some similarity to the one here under the substantive due process doctrine in People v Knox. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 DePuy’s Motions: Failure to Warn and Related ClaimsRelying on Oakberg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
 It’s awfully hard to get that ball in the net, and with 11 people in front of you it gets even harder. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" In the case of Commonwealth v Anderson, 406 Mass 343, 547 NE2d 1134 [1989], the Supreme Court of Massachusetts held that the Commonwealth must carefully comply with written, checkpoint guidelines and that "substantial compliance" is not the standard for a roadblock seizure. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Mooney that the order only ends the defendant's in-patient status. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consistent with the goal of providing delinquent children with treatment designed to achieve rehabilitation as in Matter of Quinton A., Matter of Carmelo E. and Green v. [read post]