Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 121 - 140
of 942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
In that capacity, he was trained how to catch people who attempt to use the internet to exploit minors sexually. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
If Oracle v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Of course there are many people who dislike guns, spiders, snakes, etc., without the dislike rising to the level of a phobia. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:24 am
Litowchak, the district court held that a father could name his wife’s father as a respondent in an ICARA action. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:37 am
The case, LITTLEPAIGE v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
[v] 17 AM. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
Both cases have been dismissed at the district court level. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
To reach this conclusion, the court expressly disagrees with the ruling in Doe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:19 am
The Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes California) overturned that decision and sent the case back down to the District Court for further proceedings. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
According to the court ruling, Rockland County has roughly 330,000 people. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:07 am
Both the trial court and the Fourth District Court of Appeal disagreed. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:37 am
Last year, the Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
But judges are people. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
Original post from November 10, 2011: The Supreme Court recently granted cert in Magner v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Bold applicants may even argue that the Court majority at least implicitly endorsed the district court’s reasoning that domain names are usually inherently distinctive b/c everyone understands that they are exclusive—but trademark function is a requirement even for matter that could in theory be inherently distinctive, so we might see more attention to that point. [read post]
In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable
10 May 2014, 12:23 am
The circuit judges deal with technical issues every day because their court hears all U.S. patent appeals from district court rulings. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
Samsung had pre-empted Ericsson's December 12 action in Texas by bringing a complaint five days earlier in the Intermediate People's Court in Wuhan, China, a court that has previously enaged in global FRAND rate-setting. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:32 am
One judge dissented, saying that it was clear the evidence would not support a conviction based on the “assisting” prong, and also that the district court implicitly understood this by omitting the word assist from its finding. [read post]
