Search for: "People v. Fernandez"
Results 121 - 140
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
., v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:29 am
The style of the case is, Employers Mutual Casualty Company; Emcasco Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
In May, 2010, wedding food also hospitalized at least one hundred people in Northern India. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
The panel consists of Judges Kozinski, Fernandez and Randy Smith. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
The detectives, James V. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:45 pm
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
Fernandez, and People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:59 am
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
Fernandez, 2010 U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
Fernandez v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Fernandez. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Section on Indian Nations and Indigenous Peoples Breakfast ? [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:05 pm
So here I was watching Saturday Night Live (Google v. iPhone) when I noticed this post on the MarinadeDave blog: ALERT! [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case for Consolidation Despite widespread concern, antitrust experts find little proof that the merger would substantially lessen media competition due to people increasingly distributing leisure hours across a variety of diversions aside from television viewing [29]. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
As explained in the court's opinion in Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
Compare People v. [read post]
