Search for: "People v. Harmes" Results 121 - 140 of 10,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
If D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
" Seems like I'm guilty of pandering in that situation as well given Justice Kriegler's holding in this case, which concludes that even trying (as here) to convince an existing prostitute counts as pandering; e.g., as precedent reflects, that a "substantial potential for social harm is revealed even by the act of encouraging an established prostitute to alter her business relations.This may be another one of those areas where we deliberately pass statutes that are… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Suzanne Goldberg
In that moment, it was hard to be confident that the Justices would strike down Colorado’s ban on antidiscrimination protections for gay people, given Bowers v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She also said when she was later contacted by the police, they said that someone wanted to harm her. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 8:42 am
The officers have to fear an explosion that will harm people. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:43 pm
Is throwing golfball-sized rocks under the circumstances described above an act that was "likely" to produce great bodily harm or death to Baby? [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Cheatham has ever done, it appears, has ever actually harmed anyone else, or resulted in such a risk. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Would it "substantially increase" the risk of harm to the victim? [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued  its opinion in People v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:11 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Gomez v Fuenmayor 2016 WL 454037(11th Cir, 2016) the Eleventh Circuit held that sufficiently serious threats and violence directed against a parent can nonetheless pose a grave risk of harm to a child as well. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:57 am
" And as long as that's clear, I don't see the harm in letting the police knock on your door and see if you want to voluntarily assist them.Makes sense to me. [read post]