Search for: "People v. Hurry" Results 121 - 140 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm by Mills & Mills LLP
Stevenson also referenced Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Lige (2006 SCC 23) at paragraph 20 where Justice Binnie articulated that: “[t]he test to be applied is a matter of first impression in the mind of a casual  consumer somewhat in a hurry who sees the name… and does not pause to give the matter any detailed consideration or scrutiny, nor to examine closely the similarities and differences between the marks. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
  Get over yourself; and do so in a big hurry. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
The court ordered respondents to file their responses in a hurry — by Jan. 19, with any reply due Jan. 21. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]