Search for: "People v. Johnson (1997)" Results 121 - 140 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
But the phony story had already spread worldwide, setting off riots in six countries, in which over 30 people were killed. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Grade: B Super Bowl VII 1972 This logo looks like the basic idea from Super Bowl V was copied and made a bit snazzier. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
A bunch of courts also view Campbell as killing off punitive damages class actions: In re Simon II Litigation, 407 F.3d 125, 139 (2d Cir. 2005) (Campbell mandates decertification of punitive damages class); Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Farnes, 697 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 1997); Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Allen No. 1-97-42, 1997 WL 691448, *2 (Oct. 30, 1997) (reading "purpose of being abusive, threatening, annoying, or harassing" as meaning a "purpose to mistreat another person, to express a threat to another person, to irritate another, or to persistently torment"); State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford, Margaret Taylor
Even if House Republicans had suffered a dilution of their voting power, the defendants maintain that the vote-dilution theory still would not support standing under the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Raines v. [read post]