Search for: "People v. Justice" Results 121 - 140 of 25,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Scalia wrote for a unanimous Court in 1998 in Oncale v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
Even on school grounds, racist speech can be protected, such as Nazi meetings on school grounds, see National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
But the type of harshness you see here is not his usual forte.Four conduct has to really hack off the Court of Appeal to get an opinion like this one, and from a justice like this one, no less.Hopefully people will learn the underlying lesson. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome… [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For example, if only a few justices had better understood the implications of Griswold v. [read post]