Search for: "People v. Little (1983)" Results 121 - 140 of 451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
On April 9, 1984, in response to a breakdown in talks between employers and dairy unions, the Conservative legislature of Saskatchewan enacting The Dairy Workers (Maintenance of Operations) Act, S.S. 1983‑84, c. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am by Frank Ravitch
This overview shows that Kavanaugh is a thoughtful jurist when it comes to law and religion matters, although a significant number of people might disagree with some of his analysis. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm by Harold O'Grady
The abbey was added to the Unesco World Heritage list in 1983. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Dan Maurer
§ 1259, in 1983, giving the Supreme Court appellate authority over the CAAF.) [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by MBettman
Testa,  2017-0854, is about more than the value of bobbleheads (some of us would say that is little, but collectors may disagree). [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am by Joanna Schwartz
Second, qualified immunity doctrine may discourage some people from bringing cases when their constitutional rights are violated. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor first suggested this change in legal doctrine in her 1983 dissenting opinion in City of Akron v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
A male corrections officer’s claim that his male supervisor once massaged his shoulders and made sexually explicit and aggressive comments while doing so was enough to plausibly allege a Section 1983 harassment claim, given the coupling of unwanted physical contact with threatening verbal conduct (Perry v. [read post]