Search for: "People v. Liu" Results 121 - 140 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
” (Liu Yunshan, Working Out a Path of A Socialist Modernization with Chinese Characteristics, Quishi Journal (English edition) Vol. 3(2) April 1, 2011). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
 No blood, no foul.But Justice Liu has a point as well. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What kinds of things people react to as stealing v. legit borrowing matters.A: Moral facts: a prior Q. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    New York Court Finds that Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Provision Does Not Apply Extraterritorially from Epstein Becker & Green: John Fullerton III looks at  Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]