Search for: "People v. Lopez"
Results 121 - 140
of 555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 1:35 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
We will see where that takes the people, the state, and the revolution. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 561. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 561. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Russell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Relying primarily on Lopez v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm
‡ Default as a strategy Lopez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:09 pm
(See People v Lopez). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
In a post earlier this week, I waxed poetic about the term "scrap," which was discussed in an opinion by the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday and is a derogatory term for members of the Sureño gang that is often employed by members of the rival Norteño gang. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 2:45 pm
” Fabricant, who helped draft the amicus brief filed in support of Lopez, explains why the court’s ruling is flawed and why, under the law, Lopez is entitled to counsel: “Gideon v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
ACLU v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:20 am
Uh… (People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
” He alleges it did nothing of the sort, and also contained an ingredient, yohimbe, that is dangerous for some people. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Lopez, about Congress’ Article I powers, and for cases like 2001’s Board of Trustees v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:24 pm
The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Lopez-Islava, 15-1496, Sessions v. [read post]
