Search for: "People v. Main (1984)"
Results 121 - 140
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
These amount to possibly the most bizarre submissions I've ever come across from mostly ordinarily sensible people. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:39 pm
Nice people. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
But one can also look to even more direct precedent, such as the 1984 decision in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Courts are the main audience for restatements and, as such, a restatement’s content is “generally common law. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
This court in People's Union for Democratic Rights & Others v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
As I shall explain, Scalia was right and Gorsuch is wrong.The Chevron Doctrine and Justice ScaliaThe Chevron doctrine gets its name from a 1984 case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
" §36, at 233 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
What this study indicates, however, is that judges cited philosophers most often in criminal cases,[22] and only secondly in constitutional law cases.[23] Quantitatively, the third largest category was in “Civil Practice and Procedure”.[24] To assess the area of law for each case, the main subject heading assigned to each case by Carswell was used. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
I litigated their validity for the first time in federal court in US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The United States has suspended GSP benefits 19 times since 1984. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:58 pm
V. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
” Rather, they are a form of relief incidental to the main cause of action. [read post]
