Search for: "People v. Marcos" Results 121 - 140 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am by Tobias Thienel
The article is by Marco Benatar and addresses 'The Use of Cyber Force: Need for Legal Justification'. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:19 am by SHG
  He has no qualms about people disagreeing with him. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:32 am by Will Baude
Pimentel shows indifference to the crimes of the dictator Ferdinand Marcos. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
As the Wall Street Journal reported in December 2017, the amount of surveillance equipment used for every 100,000 people in Xinjiang roughly equals what is used to monitor over a million people in other parts of China. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 August  Ofcom had a news piece “Fewer people getting news from social media”. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:06 am by gA
El título de este post debe leerse con música de Village People. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a second blog in conjunction with Samaritans advocating best practice in reporting the highly sensitive matter of the suicide of young people. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a news report “People have a right to be suspicious of journalists’ self-advocacy, but press freedom is important”. [read post]