Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 121 - 140
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
McKenna: marketing literature has some answers there.Bone: still normative.McKenna: normative to say “too close,” but descriptive to say there are degrees of closeness.Bone: in a sense blurring and tarnishment are similar. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
McKenna: but sometimes the core shifts. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
When there’s an economic downturn, maybe people speculate less. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
McKenna: not the 7th Cir. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Consider Milstein v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:19 am
Compare Pierson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
McKenna: A.f. is channeling between TM and ©. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
Mark McKenna Secondary trademark liability rules don’t necessarily derive from the common law of torts. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
McKenna James F. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
Tabari: 9th Circuit talks about what people expect when they see TMs in domain names. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
