Search for: "People v. Mike" Results 121 - 140 of 1,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
By Mike Dorf Yesterday I gave the Keynote Address at the annual luncheon of the Boston Bar Ass'n. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:31 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I examine a recent Ninth Circuit decision, Doe #1 v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
This position on injunctive relief being unavailable in light of a FRAND licensing commitment is consistent with Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 8:11 pm
"Mike" Bennett, situations unit controller at Sector Columbia River. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am by Conor McEvily
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post discusses Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 am by Legal Beagle
The Scottish Legal Aid Board have issued a statement in response to accusations from the Govan Law Centre and its principal, solicitor Mike Dailly, that SLAB’s refusal to fund a bank charges case via civil legal aid amounts to a denial of access to justice for the GLC’s client. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Nonetheless, I have come to think that just as in the run-up to Bush v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:02 am by Philip Thomas
Ironically, most people credit Florida attorney Willie Gary for that verdict even though he avoided the fee dispute. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:39 pm
By Mike Dorf In yesterday's post, I explained why the new Arizona law that attempts to "overrule" Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:31 pm
By Mike Dorf (NB: This post is expanded from its original form in response to a comment.) [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 11:30 pm
 The leading example is the Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
By Mike Dorf Last week's Supreme Court decision in Perry v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:34 pm
 Or, to take an example from the Supreme Court's current docket, in Snyder v. [read post]