Search for: "People v. Read (1983)" Results 121 - 140 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by John Ross
" Do the facility's employees (and the facility itself) count as state actors under Section 1983? [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health, Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:35 am by SHG
But there is a litany of cases, particularly following the Supreme Court’s botch of White v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am by vforberger
Schweiker, 708 F.2d 1058, 1066 (6th Cir. 1983) (Swygert, J., dissenting) (noting that the mere receipt of unemployment insurance benefits does not prove ability to work); Roberts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 9:51 am by Russell Knight
City of Rockford, 96 Ill.2d 298, 306, 70 Ill.Dec. 841, 450 N.E.2d 314 (1983), quoting Buege v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Here you can read Eikenberry’s moving affidavit and memorandum of law. [read post]