Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Hansen Chavis, a federal public defender, told the justices that interpreting the law to apply only to federal clemency would render its language meaningless in many cases, as people convicted of state crimes are not eligible for federal clemency. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
People v Bachiller, 93 AD3d 1196, 1197-1198, lv dismissed 19 NY3d 861). [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The Court made clear, however, that putting the law right does not render invalid those convicted under the previously erroneous law [100]. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:56 am
It would appear it may offer relief to people indicted in Federal Court or those convicted but whose have not become final. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People as was established in People v. [read post]
Contingency Fee Agreements in Maryland Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Cases
9 May 2013, 3:18 pm
’ The bottom line is that people should be free to hire and fire an attorney if they want to. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
However, as the trial court properly observed, the defense counsel opened the door to this challenged testimony like in the cases of People v Torres, People v Martinez, People v Ocean and People v Koury. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
The variety of historically attested meanings of "sovereignty" renders the concept useless for purposes of answering questions of comparative authority, including the authority of the Congress to mandate that individuals purchase health insurance from a private market. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
In Stern v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
(People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
As NRA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
NY - PEOPLE v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:57 am
People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 8:10 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:23 pm
Earlier today the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rendered its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Coakley, is whether the Court’s 2000 decision in Hill v. [read post]
