Search for: "People v. Ring" Results 121 - 140 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
They got business by “doing good work” getting an A-V Martindale-Hubbell rating, being visible in the community and waiting for the phone to ring. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
What about people, such as Ace Books, who had relied on the Lord of the Rings’ public domain status in the interim, before it was restored? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Having completely redefined the basis of political representation the Constitution requires, the Court’s reticence about not wanting to choose between competing theories of representation when it comes to voters or people rings hollow. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Bobby Stroup
For example, one key due date is in Section 8(b)(iv)–(v). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
With the recent emergence of high profile cases such as Nokia v iPhone, this could see patent cases in the mobile phone industry for some time to come. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:09 pm
The case of Ram Lakhan v State 137 (2007) DLT 173 on begging is a lesson in stupid laws and sensitive adjudication. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm by NL
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm by NL
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:43 pm
Actually, the prosecutor eliminated all five black people from a final jury pool of 36 people. [read post]