Search for: "People v. Score"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 9:22 am
But at the same time, we don’t know these people. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 11:46 am
Score one for the serfs. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:23 am
If, however, we properly use electoral college point scoring rather than total points scoring, and we break the Illinois v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
People v Wheeler, 59 AD3d 1007, lv denied 12 NY3d 711). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
(And perhaps once they have concluded that the agency has reasonably exercised discretion on that score.) [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:36 am
In the case of People v Harris, Malcolm Harris is being prosecuted for disorderly conduct in connection with the Occupy Wall Street protest in October 2011. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
An applicant had to score three points. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:36 pm
The seminal case for “Accessory After the Fact” is People v Luca, 402 Mich 302, 304; 262 NW2d 662 (1978). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:17 pm
The State of Texas claims that the score of 61 was obtained on an aberrant test and that his real IQ is over 70. (100 is average) In Atkins v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Jarkesy, and why I believe it’s a bigger deal than most people seem to think. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:43 pm
On April 15, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
In 2012, Michael Trkulja famously scored defamation victories against Yahoo! [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
If King v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
Disclosure: a speaker, yesterday, at a lecture I attended used the Henry 2 v Henry 8 line to describe the possible results, saying that, of course, the decision wouldn’t be put quite that way. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 5:36 pm
Syverson v. [read post]
