Search for: "People v. Speaks (1981)" Results 121 - 140 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am by Josh Blackman
We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise for Twitter letting people go to individual pages such as http://twitter.com/RealDonaldTrump, Facebook letting people to go to individual Facebook pages, YouTube letting people view individual videos, and the like. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm by Mike Scarcella
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by Russell Knight
Small business people become franchisees of these brands to happily enjoy the goodwill of the brands. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A Law Commission report on Breach of Confidence in 1981 raised hopes that legislation might happen, even appending a brief draft bill, but no-one was interested so that was that. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schwartz, Partner, Constantine CannonDownload TestimonyRoad began in 1981 with 9th Circuit’s ruling against VCRs. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
During the signing, my Aunt indicated that she wanted to make some minor changes to the percentages being distributed to some of the people in her [w]ill, and some handwritten changes were made at that time. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am by SHG
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the… [read post]