Search for: "People v. Stuart"
Results 121 - 140
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (1859). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
Anna Edwards-Stuart (11 South Square) then took up the microphone and provided the alternative view. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 am
Bush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Georgia, Dred Scott, Pollock, and Schechter Poultry (preemptive opinions in past generational collisions), or will the Court add its stamp of approval, as happened in Stuart v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 12:15 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
Democrats Sue Over 'G.O.P.' on the Ballot [NY Times] Smith v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
First, people who are prescribed lots of opioids are likely to be disabled. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:49 am
(People do that pretty much every year. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:36 am
In Austin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
David Quinto and Stuart Singer are the authors. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:37 am
TripAdvisor and Yelp v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
In a piece at Time, Adam Cohen offers detailed background on Skinner v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 5:49 am
Although many people criticize the pragmatism, he can never be considered a common philosophy. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
App. 1993); 4 [Harper], §§ 25.8, at 553; [2 Stuart M. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
Snyder, R-Stuart. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People… [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
Stuart J. [read post]
