Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Good)"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm
In 1992, the Pennsylvania Superior Court discussed this issue in detail in a case called Strutz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:24 pm
See Miranda v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
Schinas said UEFA's soccer competitions were doing a lot better than some people suggest. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
The FTT decision had been made before the Court of Appeal judgment in Rakusen v Jepson (our note) on the liability of a superior landlord to sub-tenants for an RRO, but that judgment was not of direct application here on the facts. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:52 am
Superior Ct.), a petition for a “harassment restraining order” in California court. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng claims that his proposed Consensus Rule is epistemically superior to Rule 702 gatekeeping. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
But good progressives would almost certainly agree that John Q. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
When there is evidence of real risk of such violence—for instance, possible physical retaliation against people who cooperated with the government[21] or risk of violence against an asylum seeker in his home country[22]—courts do indeed generally allow pseudonymity, entirely apart from whether the violence stems from religious views.[23] The same would apply to people who fear religion-related violence, as in Doe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
" Both Mikes make good points. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Are the higher pleasures infinitely superior and always trump any quantity of lower? [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
There is a good reason that one speaks of rabbinic "courts" atop any given Chasidic movement. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Speakers who claim first-hand knowledge of some incident are essentially claiming to have superior expertise about the incident: They were present, and (usually) very few other people were. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm
European Court of Human RightsNajafli v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
