Search for: "People v. Vinson" Results 121 - 140 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
  The respondent’s name in the first case nicely captures most people’s instinctive reaction upon discussing AEDPA:  Ryan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:48 pm by Alison Barnes
Perhaps, wrote Judge Vinson in the 11th circuit in the course of finding the mandate unconstitutional, people could be required to buy broccoli. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Justice Stevens:   My impression is that the Justices spent more time talking to each other and the clerks under Vinson. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 5:02 am
  Eighteen months later, after a few visits from V&E managing partner Joseph Dilg, she came back as a partner with the understanding that V&E could provide some flexibility and let her attend after-school events if she could up on work later at home. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:40 am by SHG
As the Davis Court acknowledged by citing Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  One category includes people who have anxiety about sex and hope that a sexual surrogate can help them overcome their anxiety, thus enabling them to go on to have fulfilling sexual relationships with people whom they will not be paying. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:06 am by SHG
(For seven months, he tried to move the deciding justices on Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
  No troll cartoons, unfortunately, but it was fun to watch Hilda talk about the SanDisk v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm by Ellie Rudnick
Nelson, Vinson & Elkins Professor at the University of Houston Law Center, argued that courts need clearer guidance to adjudicate religious accommodation claims in the workplace following the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. [read post]