Search for: "People v. Ward" Results 121 - 140 of 618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
   Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:11 am
Jones Ward PLC's lawyers have experience with representing people that have been injured by cars that have been recalled or should have been recalled because of various defects. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 7:32 am by Sasha Volokh
More generally, thanks to the organizations and people involved for recognizing that we're all in this together: pro-life people who oppose Hill v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Kalvis Golde
Briefly: At the Stanford Law Review, Thomas Ward Frampton urges a second look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ controversial dissent in Flowers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 6:48 am by SHG
But the smugs v. trolls view is a false equivalency. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]