Search for: "People v. Wells (1985)"
Results 121 - 140
of 919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
The Brandenburg test applies to civil cases as well. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 pm
The more modern case of Nicholson v Nicholson, 199 N. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
[People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:15 pm
” (People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
In LB Southwark v Over 13,000 Leaseholders in the borough LON/00BE/LDC/2009/0061 (not yet available online), the LVT rejected an application for dispensation under s.20ZA, 1985 Act. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:27 am
See, Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The recent amendments to the Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp) and the Supreme Court of Canada decision, Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24 suggest that lawyers are required to screen for family violence to be able to competently comply with their statutory obligations. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Perhaps -- but such implementation might require the New Jersey courts to challenge the legacy of Euclid v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 662 for attributing individual wrongdoing to a corporation, we respectfully add this. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
Of the remaining 25 counts, 19 involved incidents occurring between September 1983 and November 1984 and 6 involved incidents occurring between November 1984 and December 1985. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
Wade favorably cited Jacobson, as well as Buck v. [read post]
