Search for: "Peoples et al v. Property " Results 121 - 140 of 811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
” (quoted in Brest et al., Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials (5th ed. 2006) p. 66.) [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court granted review in a free speech case, 303 Creative, et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Larson et al., 2021 ONSC 2469  [53] Consequently, on this record, LPPC breached the trust established by the Construction Act. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:17 am by Leland Garvin
Twistee Treat USA et al., recently before Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:17 am by Leland Garvin
Twistee Treat USA et al., recently before Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
If a law does require the platforms to host various materials, all it would take is for the platforms to sufficiently inform the public about that law—something the Facebooks and Twitters of the world have ample communicative resources to do, for instance using a clickthrough warning that they can show once or a few times to their users. [169] Brief Amici Curiae of the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association, Law Student Associations, et al., Rumsfeld v. [read post]