Search for: "Petersen v. Petersen"
Results 121 - 140
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:52 am
V. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
(Burlesci v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
The appellate court, citing Babu v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:01 am
In Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:29 am
Related: Nursing home found at fault after woman dies, Duluth News Tribune, September 16, 2010 Medication Errors, Nursing Home Injury Laws Fixed Minidose Warfarin and Aspirin Alone and in Combination vs Adjusted-Dose Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (PDF) by Annette Lemche Gulløv, MD; Birgitte Gade Koefoed, MD; Palle Petersen, MD, DMSc; Trine Sander Pedersen, MD; Ellen Damgaard Andersen, MD; John Godtfredsen, MD, DMSc; Gudrun Boysen, MD, DMSc,… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
The appellate court, citing Babu v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 645 (1981) (reiterating the desirability of “[v]oluntary accommodations regarding matrimonial differences”); Ozolins v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:37 am
Gomes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:11 pm
” Raynor v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:11 pm
” Raynor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
Petersen, 94 Wn.2d 690, 694, 619 P.2d 697 (1980), citing Barker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Petersen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
Stewart and Kyle Petersen On January 10, 2013, U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:36 am
That’s the tough lesson that an LLC member facing termination of his membership status learned in Costello v Molloy et al., 73 Misc 3d 1206(A) [Sup Ct 2021]. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
See Boschma v. [read post]