Search for: "Petty v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2008, 2:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:14 am
O'Scannlain worries that a state could not appeal an erroneous order that stops short of ordering release.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Petty, 367 F.3d 1009, 1013 (8th Cir. 2004) (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:04 pm
It is among our Nation’s proudest boasts that, '[i]f there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in [matters of] religion.' West Virginia State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
[In Wooden v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Thus, twenty years ago, in Bush v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am
It represents instead a sorry reflection of the pettiness of current political debate in Washington. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:24 pm
Examples include petty theft, reckless driving, first time DUI, simple assault and battery, possession of less than one once of marijuana, and under age drinking. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.Justice Jackson, writing for the Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that ruling, but last week, in Jones v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:49 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:54 am
Citing Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly dismissed Plaintiff's age discrimination claim brought pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296] because Plaintiff "failed to allege an adverse employment action. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:54 am
Citing Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly dismissed Plaintiff's age discrimination claim brought pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296] because Plaintiff "failed to allege an adverse employment action. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Di Liscia v. [read post]
