Search for: "Philip v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 9:02 am
Marsh v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:30 am
[Philip Hamburger's Op-Ed at the Federalist on a case to be argued next week] On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Oppo are also facing pressure from SEP infringement claims by Philips in the UK, with the first trials listed later in 2023. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:58 pm
The Evolution of Hong Kong’s International Positioning from Western Imperialism to Chinese Authoritarianism Walther Schücking Lecture Daniel McCarthy, Professor Bruno Simma’s Reflections on Dispute Resolution at the Peace Palace General Articles Julien Berger, The End of Intra-EU Investor-State Arbitration Henning Goeke, Moria 2.0 – Systemic Human Rights Violation and the Chance of a Pilot Decision Silvia Venier, The International Regime Governing Notification,… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
Albert’s Diamond Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
, Best v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:44 pm
In Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, C.A. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:03 am
Courts and state legislatures continue to take aim at post-employment non-competes. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:53 am
Much to the contrary, it's hard to think of anyone who would have made a greater contribution to the fight against hold-out: the two Sisvel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:47 am
That duty included representing those accused of conspiring to overthrow the government, as in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism 139, 142 (Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Philip Bobbitt’s theory of interpretive modalities is of this kind. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
