Search for: "Phoenix v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 982
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm by Leslie Pardo
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(See: Hamilton, para. 37) The Applicant’s factum states, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Following other unsuccessful attempts, such as in Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
March 24, Time TBA (but probably around noon), Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ: "The Free Market Conservative Case for Open Borders," sponsored by Arizona State Federalist Society. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 5:37 am
United States [Updated 2019] appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale . [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Telegram TRO   Dating back to as early as 2014, the SEC began bringing enforcement actions relating to cryptocurrency, and with its October 11, 2019 filing of SEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]