Search for: "Pike v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am by SHG
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:56 am by Kevin Walsh
What may appear on the surface of judicial opinions to be a cost-benefit analysis is likely to reflect either (1) decisions on other grounds (as often happens in dormant Commerce Clause analysis of non-discriminatory state legislation under Pike v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lamar Tennessee, LLC v City of Knoxville, 2016 WL 746503 (TN App. 2/25/2016)    Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Non-Conforming Uses, Signs, Uncategorized [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:03 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Anyone who driving in Boston or on the Mass Pike during the winter has surely seen huge chunks of ice and snow falling off the top of a car or truck. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 1:00 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
In a short per curiam opinion, the Court concluded in Snepp v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Green Hills Neighborhood Assoc. v Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County TN, 2015 WL 2393977 (TN App. 5/18/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Jurisdiction, Overlay Zone [read post]