Search for: "Pitts v. Pitts" Results 121 - 140 of 470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm by Howard Knopf
Reading this and the suggestion by iPolitics quoted recently by me here, it would seem to appear that Blacklock’s wants to stay all of these lawsuits other than T-117-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
First American Home Buyers Protection Corp., 732 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2013) (discussed here); Pitts v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The decision means that debate about the merits of the English Court of Appeal decision in Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 have been put to bed once and for all. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  There is however one further important curiosity relating to Part 5 of the Bill concerning information held by HMRC and arising from a case recently before the Supreme Court, R (Ingenious Media and Anr) v HMRC. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
There has been some discussion regarding the merits of the decision of the English Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 over the last 20 years (see, for example, paragraphs 5.15 & 13.12 of Munkman on Employer’s Liability, 16th Edition). [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:38 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:31 pm by Lisa Baird
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]