Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 121 - 140 of 177,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiffs’ claims under Judiciary Law § 487 are timely, Supreme Court correctly granted defendant’s motion. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
  However, the Chancery Court’s recent decision in In re Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The plaintiff, a stockholder of the Company, argued that these provisions violated Sections 141(a) and 141(c) of the DGCL. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:24 pm by Howard Bashman
“Judicial Notice (06.09.24): After Affirmative Action; Important opinions from Judge Kevin Newsom, the start of the Hunter Biden trial, a plaintiffs’ firm’s big payday, and the latest group hire by Paul Hastings. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- affirming district court’s district decision that the CIA properly invoked Exemption 1 to withhold a 1989 report drafted by Leonard Peroots concerning a 1983 nuclear crisis with the Soviet Union; rejecting plaintiffs argument that the CIA was precluded from withholding the memo because the State Department previously published a version of the memo with the CIA’s blessing. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
“It’s different for all of us, and that’s a strength. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Andrew Delaney
Eventually, with plaintiff's participation and going over some heads, the project went through and the State got the savings. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:48 am by David Adelstein
Contrary to the District’s argument, the setoff statute applies where a plaintiff releases “any person” — the statute is not limited to only litigants. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:40 pm by Allan Blutstein
Marshals Service properly relied on Exemption 7(C) in refusing to confirm or deny the existence of certain third-party information relating to plaintiffs criminal case'; and (2) USMS performed adequate search for certain records the agency did not locate pertaining to plaintiffs criminal case. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
In 2020, the plaintiff learned that “Defendant was using Plaintiffs Marks in online tamale advertisements and in Google AdWords, which placed Defendant’s products above Plaintiffs products in search results for the phrase ‘Texas Tamale.'” That prompted this litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 4:03 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The plaintiffs evidentiary proffer is “merely a representation of what evidence the defendant proposes to present and is not actual evidence. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:50 pm
That appears to be plaintiff's claim -- that the vaccine merely helps the body fight COVID and hence not die. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:45 pm by Seeger Weiss
This year, Chris was listed in Band 1 for Product Liability: Plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But it's a sad day at their house when a different toy arrives. [read post]
The plaintiffs, seven patrons of the Llano County library system, brought suit against Llano County, the members of the County’s Commissioners Court, the library system director, and the library board for pulling the books from the system, alleging that the defendant’s violated their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]