Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 121 - 140
of 69,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Cleland granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel with regard to specific search terms requested for the defendant to perform. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:52 am
March 14, 2022), the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint asserting claims of patent infringement against defendants arising from defendants’ lung cancer diagnostic test product. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:17 am
The court denied defendant's motion to compel the production of documents and rejected defendant's argument that plaintiff's non-practicing entity status precluded it from asserting privilege over ongoing business valuations of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The court noted that contention interrogatories are particularly warranted when a defendant is faced with circular or ambiguous allegations.After finding that the Plaintiff's generic responses to the contention interrogatories and simple reference to documents and expert reports previously produced to be insufficient, the court granted the Defendant's motion to compel.Anyone wishing to secure a copy of Judge Nealon's Opinion… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:06 pm
Here’s a link to the reply that the defendants filed very close to midnight on Monday, responding to the plaintiff’s opposition to the defendants’ dispositive motions in Partington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:10 am
In light of these market dynamics, the court concludes that [defendant's] infringement has seriously affected [plaintiff's] market position. . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
In granting defendant's motion to stay pending reexamination, the court rejected plaintiff's argument that a stay would prejudice plaintiff's rights in that it would delay resolution of the litigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
This ruling is in line with the Second, Sixth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals, all of whom have previously held that a plaintiff’s incorporation abroad destroys diversity jurisdiction in a lawsuit against a foreign defendant, even if the plaintiff’s principal place of business is in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:36 am
In light of this concern, at the hearing Plaintiff’s counsel, who also represents [plaintiff's president], agreed that Plaintiff and [its president] would provide discovery into [its president's] representation of [defendants]." [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:02 am
" Raniere v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Kirk v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:09 am
The court denied without prejudice defendants' motion to compel discovery regarding plaintiff's settlement negotiations where plaintiff already produced the settlement agreements. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 7:26 am
Brands LLC, 137 S.Ct. 1514 (2017), the court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's patent infringement action for improper venue and found that defendant did not waive its venue defense through its counterclaim. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 11:26 am
September 24, 2021), the Court (1) denied Plaintiff Apex Clearing Corporation’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of defendants’ experts Mumford and Distler; (2) denied Plaintiff Axos Bank’s motion for summary judgment on four counts of trademark infringement; (3) denied defendants/counter-plaintiffs Axos Financial, Inc. and Axos Clearing LLC’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement; and (4)… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
" Clearlamp, LLC v. [read post]
U.S. District Court Vacates Personal Injury Defendant’s Default After Determining Good Cause Existed
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm
In Barbot v. [read post]
U.S. District Court Vacates Personal Injury Defendant’s Default After Determining Good Cause Existed
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm
In Barbot v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion for expert witness fees as sanctions under the court's inherent power because of plaintiff's reprehensible conduct. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 11:02 am
The Facts (Sara Quejada v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 11:02 am
The Facts (Sara Quejada v. [read post]
