Search for: "Plaintiff 2"
Results 121 - 140
of 56,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2018, 6:12 am
§ 29-26-121(a)(2)(E), only requires substantial compliance, but to “substantially comply…a plaintiff must provide a defendant with a HIPAA compliant medical authorization that will allow the defendant to obtain the plaintiff’s medical records from all other providers being sent the notice. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
Jury Awards Plaintiff $2 Million Compensatory and $10.5 Million Punitive Damages in DuPont Chemical Leak Case A jury recently awarded a man $2 million in economic damages who alleged he developed testicular cancer after a chemical leaked from one of DuPont’s plants, according to one news source. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
Jury Awards Plaintiff $2 Million Compensatory and $10.5 Million Punitive Damages in DuPont Chemical Leak Case A jury recently awarded a man $2 million in economic damages who alleged he developed testicular cancer after a chemical leaked from one of DuPont’s plants, according to one news source. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Shuffle Master, Inc., 2-09-cv-01519 (NVD November 16, 2010, Order) (Hunt, J.) [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:58 pm
This week, an Eleventh Circuit panel, in a 2-1 decision, reversed the approval of an incentive payment to the named plaintiff, calling the payment an unauthorized bounty. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:07 am
For example, if the defendant rear ends the plaintiff in a car accident, the plaintiff may sue for those injuries. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:52 am
Slip Op. at 2. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:52 pm
In a case that was being closely-watched by those in the legal community, a jury awarded $2 million to a woman who alleged C.R. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:04 am
The Plaintiff, a 62-year-old man who had to have more than two feet of his colon removed due to perforations in his colon he acquired during a routine colonoscopy; received a $2 million verdict against two doctors who treated him. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
One person objected to the settlement on the grounds that (1) the objection deadline was set before the deadline for class counsel to file their attorneys’ fee petition, which she contended violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Due Process Clause; (2) the amount of the settlement should have been higher; (3) the court should have conducted a lodestar calculation in determining reasonable attorneys’ fees; and (4) plaintiff’s $6,000 incentive award… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
One person objected to the settlement on the grounds that (1) the objection deadline was set before the deadline for class counsel to file their attorneys’ fee petition, which she contended violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Due Process Clause; (2) the amount of the settlement should have been higher; (3) the court should have conducted a lodestar calculation in determining reasonable attorneys’ fees; and (4) plaintiff’s $6,000 incentive award… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
One person objected to the settlement on the grounds that (1) the objection deadline was set before the deadline for class counsel to file their attorneys’ fee petition, which she contended violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Due Process Clause; (2) the amount of the settlement should have been higher; (3) the court should have conducted a lodestar calculation in determining reasonable attorneys’ fees; and (4) plaintiff’s $6,000 incentive award… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:57 am
Kaur) the Plaintiff sued for personal injuries and 2 business days prior to trial delivered a formal offer of $425,000. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:07 am
") Published: 2/2/2015 12:04 PM [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 9:06 am
App. 2 Cir. 8/10/16), 206 So.3d 323, a hospital was attempting to recover on its medical lien against the patient for the full amount of medical services charged (without accounting for the patient’s health insurance discount). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:19 am
When they made this request, it was done through filing a motion, and only 2 of 18 defendant’s decided to file a motion to oppose her request. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
Failure to Follow Procedural Rules May Result in Delay or Dismissal of Florida Personal Injury Cases, Cecere Santana Injury Lawyers Blog, published March 2, 2017. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
Failure to Follow Procedural Rules May Result in Delay or Dismissal of Florida Personal Injury Cases, Cecere Santana Injury Lawyers Blog, published March 2, 2017. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 1:03 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed Ninth Circuit’s decision, holding that to meet §1113(2)’s “actual knowledge” requirement, the plaintiff must in fact have become aware of the information. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
These alleged statements, read in conjunction with plaintiff’s other factual allegations, described plaintiff’s claims with sufficient specificity to state a claim under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2). [read post]
